USA vs Iraan

[kaur3]

Huvitavat lugemist Iraani kohta.

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displa ... id=9514293
http://www.economist.com/specialreports ... id=9466834

[potentate]

Trumm ja Kruuda, minuarust lahmite te niisama, ajate mingit ebamäärast mulli.

Pealegi, see ARTIKKEL, algas kirjeldusega õppuste tsenaariumist mis USAL käsil oli!
Natuke segaselt oli kirjutatud ja teie kohe lugesite tuumapomm, õhurünnakud, punkrid... VÄU .... põmm põmm

[Zill154]

Sama siin!Mitte et ei oleks realset ohtu vaid kuidagi vara arvustada seda siin,mida iraan teeks kui tal oleks tuumarelv.Kas mitte sama ei arvatud põhja-korea kohta??

[kaur3]

Väike signaal iraanlastele.

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/ ... el=defense

[Würger 190G]

Lõpuks ometi üks korralik lugu selle rünnaku kohta ja hea lause:
“Part of the vulnerability of the Syrian facility was that they kept it so secret that there weren’t enough air defenses assigned to it,” the official contends

[paul]

Sõda vist tänasest päevakorrast maas:

Iraan arendab tuumarelva? USA luure avastas, et eksis

Eileööse tegi CNN kah tõsist nägu, miski "endine CIA luureametnik" väitis, et luure usaldusväärsus langes tugevalt jne.
Mis pakute? Otsustati, et uut sõda pole vaja või ongi selline prohmakas?

[Kapral Karu]

CIA on tasemel, varem või hiljem jõuab neilegi pärale... Alles see oli, kui neile jõudis pärale (või siis avalikustasid nad oma "salajase luureinfo"), et olukord maailmas pole Iraagi sõja tulemusena turvalisemaks läinud, vaid vastupidi. No ja siis muidugi need Iraagi "bio-, keemia- jm massirelvad". Või "uraaniost" Aafrikast.

Vähemalt paistab selles firmas olevat ka ausaid inimesi.

[Würger 190G]

Valimised tulemas, eks nüüd hakkab inffi tulema, mis ei pruugi tõene olla, peaasi et saaks valmiste käigus teisele parteile käru keerata. Kui ikka CIA nii loll on, milleks seda pidada?

[-iff-]

Siia sobiks riputada Ränduri poolne arvamus-info Gruusia teema juurest loodan, et Rändur ei pahanda

Postitatud: 09 Aug 2008 3:45 am Teema:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Huvitav ajastus, mitmes mõttes. Kas ka asjad seotud ja suurema plaani osad?...
Selle Iraani asja kohta veidi tõenäolisem allikas:


http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7011874353

Samuti väga huvitav link araterI poolt!!!

http://europebusines.blogspot.com/2008/ ... -iran.html

[Rändur]

Eriti enam sel teemal keegi vist arvamusi kergelt ei julge avaldada - liiga palju on olnud alusetuid spekulatsioone Kahtlemata on praegune sündmused ja ajastused varasemast 'huvitavamad'. Seda Iraani sõja hädakella küll liiga kaua taotud. Sama jutu avaldas igatahes ka Jerusalem Post.

[Reigo]

http://www.debka.com/headline.php?hid=5499

August 11, 2008, 10:37 AM (GMT+02:00)
New America armada around Iran

DEBKAfile’s military sources note that the arrival of the three new American flotillas will raise to five the number of US strike forces in Middle East waters – an unprecedented build-up since the crisis erupted over Iran’s nuclear program.

This vast naval and air strength consists of more than 40 carriers, warships and submarines, some of the last nuclear-armed, opposite the Islamic Republic, a concentration last seen just before the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Our military sources postulate five objects of this show of American muscle:

1. The US, aided also by France, Britain and Canada, is finalizing preparations for a partial naval blockade to deny Iran imports of benzene and other refined oil products. This action would indicate that the Bush administration had thrown in the towel on stiff United Nations sanctions and decided to take matters in its own hands.

2. Iran, which imports 40 percent of its refined fuel products from Gulf neighbors, will retaliate for the embargo by shutting the Strait of Hormuz oil route chokepoint, in which case the US naval and air force stand ready to reopen the Strait and fight back any Iranian attempt to break through the blockade.

3. Washington is deploying forces as back-up for a possible Israeli military attack on Iran’s nuclear installations.

4. A potential rush of events in which a US-led blockade, Israeli attack and Iranian reprisals pile up in a very short time and precipitate a major military crisis.

5. While a massive deployment of this nature calls for long planning, its occurrence at this time cannot be divorced from the flare-up of the Caucasian war between Russia and Georgia. While Russia has strengthened its stake in Caspian oil resources by its overwhelming military intervention against Georgia, the Americans are investing might in defending the primary Persian Gulf oil sources of the West and the Far East.

DEBKAfile’s military sources name the three US strike forces en route to the Gulf as the USS Theodore Roosevelt , the USS Ronald Reagan and the USS Iwo Jima . Already in place are the USS Abraham Lincoln in the Arabian Sea opposite Iranian shores and the USS Peleliu which is cruising in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

[kaur3]

Aug 8, 2008 0:35 | Updated Aug 9, 2008 20:23
'We'll neutralize S-300 if they're sold to Iran'

"Russia will have to think real hard before delivering this system to Iran, which is possibly on the brink of conflict with either Israel or the US, since if the system is delivered, an EW [electronic warfare] system will likely be developed to neutralize it, and if that happens it would be catastrophic not only for Iran but also for Russia," the defense official said.

Neutralization of one of the main components of Russian air defense would be a blow to Russian national security as well as to defense exports. "No country will want to buy the system if it is proven to be ineffective," the official said. "For these reasons, Russia may not deliver it in the end to Iran."

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite? ... 2FShowFull

[araterI]

Üldiselt on mul allergia igasuguste vandenõuteooriate suhtes aga midagi väga mitte-vandenõuteoorialikku on nendes Lähis-Ida uudistes

ttp://www.metimes.com/International/2008/08/1 ... gulf/7724/
SPECIAL REPORT: Kuwait Readying for War in Gulf?

Analysis: Is war in the (Gulf) air?

Ma ei usu, et Putja ja Džoordž ei rääkinud Pekingis sõnakestki Iraanist ja kui ei rääkinud ja Vene ei ole poolt suud ka antud teemal paotanud, siis seda kindlam on, et rääkisid. Siit edasi L-Osseetia jne

Brimstone kontinget täiesti avalikutl ka 2.navy lehel väljas
http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=38478

[kaur3]

The Last Resort: Consequences of Preventive Military Action against Iran

http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/temp ... hp?CID=292

[kaur3]

Israel Air Force test pilots are flying MIG 29 jets and conducting dogfights against the IAF's F-16 fighters, Israel TV Channel 2 revealed last Wednesday. The MIG 29, developed by the soviets in the 1970s, is one of the best fighter jets used by eastern and Arab countries, as well as by Syria and Iran. It was developed to counter American-made jets such the F-16 or F/A-18.

http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/de ... d=blogDest