Kui on olemas selline (standardiseeritud) test, siis peavad kuskil olemas olemas ka reeglid. militaar.net-i tarkpead ootavad huviga neid.
Ma juba ju viitasingi nendele samadele reeglitele. Loe mu eelnevad postitused läbi, seal on lingid nende testide protseduuridele. Ma isegi tsiteerisin konkreetset lõiku kus see on kirjas.
ja relva (kaubanduslik) välimus pole testi tulemustes eraldi fikseeritavate andmete hulgas
On fikseeritavate andmete hulgas, kuid ei mõjuta otseselt antud testi läbimist.
ps. Ülitundlikuks timmitud päästikuga snaiperrelv teeb raudselt ilma kaitseriivita iseeneseliku lasu.
Minu arust nõudis protseduur, et kaitseriiv oleks peal. See on kusjuures üldine ohutusnõue relva käsitlemisel. Riivi ei võeta enne maha kui relv on õiges suunas ja kasutaja on valmis laskma. See on sisuliselt viimane samm enne laskmist.
EDIT: Väike parandus. Paistab, et test tehakse nii kaitseriiviga kui ka ilma.
Kas sopa- ja veevanni kastetud relva laskekatse on standardis?
Kusjuures on küll. Sellesama varasemalt viidatud dokumendis on see kirjeldatud järgnevalt:
4.5.5 Mud Test.
a. Background. This subtest determines the effects of mud on weapon performance. The
test is done in two stages. Stage one is an immersion of the weapon in liquid mud followed
immediately with weapon firing; stage two is identical except that the mud is allowed to dry
before firing the weapon.
b. Method. Prepare a mud bath as follows:
(1) Make a mixture of 4.5 kg (10 lb) of montmorillonite clay, 1 kg (2.2 lb) of
SIL-CO-SIL 125 as used in the Sand and Dust test (para 4.5.4), and about 45.51 (48 qt) of water.
The amount of water to be added to the sand and clay mixture will vary with the moisture
content of these components. The water content will be limited to the quantity producing a mud
viscosity of 4600 + 200 centipoises as determined with a Brookfield viscometer. The
measurement conditions are as shown in the following table.
(2) Stage No. 1 test for hand guns and shoulder weapons.
(a) Clean and lubricate three test weapons and close the muzzles with tape. Load
three magazines for each weapon, place the safety switch in the Safe position, insert one of the
loaded magazines and charge the weapon. Since the weapon is ready to fire, extreme caution
must be taken to assure that the safety switch is not accidentally disengaged and that the
weapon is always pointed in a safe direction.
(b) Fully immerse the first weapon, in a horizontal orientation, in the mud bath for
a period of 1 minute. Remove the weapon from the mud bath, wipe it with bare hands to remove
excess mud, remove the tape from the muzzle, disengage the safety switch, and fire the rounds in
the magazine (fire in the semiautomatic mode, or if possible, fire in short bursts of three to five
rounds). Note: The predominant malfunction encountered in this test is that the bolt cannot be
retracted or closed by hand or by gun action without considerable effort. In most instances, it
will be necessary to strike the bolt-retracting lever a sharp blow with the hand to open the action.
If firing is unsatisfactory with the magazine assembled in the weapon, replace the magazine with
the second, clean, magazine and continue firing.
(c) If firing with the clean magazine is unsatisfactory, open the weapon’s bolt, dust
cover, etc. and attempt to wash out the mud by poring 1 L (approximately 1 qt) of clean water
over and into the receiver. Assure that any water has been drained from the weapon bore and
attempt to fire the third, clean, magazine.
(d) If firing continues to be unsatisfactory, perform a field stripping operation,
with parts hand-wiped with a cloth, to determine whether the weapon can be returned to a
serviceable condition in the field.
(e) Repeat the above procedure for the remaining two weapons.
(4) Stage No. 2 mud test.
Conduct this test in a manner identical to that of the stage No. 1 mud test, except that the
weapons and ammunition are permitted to dry, without any wiping or cleaning, for at least
4 hours after being removed from the mud bath.
c. Data Required. Record the following:
(1) Number of rounds fired.
(2) Malfunctions in accordance with paragraph 5.
(3) Number of attempts to overcome each malfunction.
(4) Maintenance actions performed.
(5) Difficulties encountered in the operation of safety switches, charging the weapon,
magazine insertion and removal, etc.