Militaarteemad minevikust kaasaega
https://www.militaar.net/phpBB2/
Antud jutu kohta, mis käis lennuki tagatiibade ja kaldtüüride liikumisulatusest ja agiilsusest oli kaasa pandud illustreeriv video ruleerimisel. Lisan selle siia:Another aspect is the kind of reaction I get when I push the stick forward; the F-35 reacts immediately, and not delayed like the F-16. Looking at another F-35 doing such maneuvers is an impressive sight. The various control surfaces on the airplane are large, and they move very quickly. I can monitor these movements on the screens in my cockpit, and I´m fascinated by how the control surfaces move when I manipulate the stick and pedals. Especially at high AOA, it is not always intuitive what control surfaces move, and by how much.
The final «textbook» for how to best employ the F-35 in visual combat – BFM – is not written. It is literally being written by my neighbor, down here in Arizona! We have had many good discussions on this topic over the last few weeks, and it feels very rewarding to be part the development. I would emphasize the term “multirole” after experiencing this jet in many roles, and now also in a dogfight. The F-35 has a real bite! Those in doubt will be surprised when they finally meet this «bomber”.
Does Russian aggression highlight the need for a fifth-generation aircraft like the F-35 in Europe?
I think it makes it inevitable. The proliferation of the anti-access, aerial-denied (A2AD) environment makes it necessary. Russia has gone into the 21st century. They are fielding some pretty capable equipment. They are layering them in such a way that allows for a redundancy, they have demonstrated a willingness to continue to spend on defense because they believe that those A2AD environments are a direct counter to what we are doing with the NATO reforms. I don’t think that is coincidental. I think that potentially Putin is taking away the very readiness and responsiveness gains that we are trying to do through reorganization and positioning.
Will you consider a permanent base of F-22s in Europe?
I don’t think I’m there yet. It might come to that. I think the F-22s have been heavily involved in Syria. They have been heavily tasked to do missions worldwide and my view of it as a responsible combatant commander if I don’t specifically need the F-22. Although it would certainly be beneficial if it was an F-22, these tasks can be done with another aircraft. I am just trying to make good use of that asset. We only have 186 of them, and 30 of them I think are in training. I try to be a good steward of the asset and the money.
When are you going to get the first squadrons of F-35s in Europe? What unique capabilities will the F-35 bring?
It looks like we will get our first F-35 squadron in 2021. It is going to bring the ability to strike. It is going to be able to deliver air superiority. The beauty of the F-35 is for the first time ever we have an airplane that literally can do four out of five core competencies. It can do air and space superiority, it can do strike, it can do intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) and it can do command and control. I personally can’t wait. I wish it was higher in the priority to come here, but I am accepting of that. It is soon that we begin the process of laying down the infrastructure needed to work that airplane. I think we are in good shape.
I would love to have both the F-22 and the F-35 in Europe. They are that complementary. But we don’t have no plans nor have we discussed anything about forward basing any F-22s because we do it via a rotational basis.
Tüüp tegeleb sellega oma vabast ajast põhitöö kõrvlat, mis on samuti aeronautika vallas. Vanemate lennukite info on võetud otse manuaalidest. Enamike F-16, F-15 ja F-18 versioonide puhul on osad manuaalid vabalt kättesaadavad. Uuemate puhul on kasutatud kõike mis ametlikest kanalitest on väljaöeldud: Teadaolevaid spetsifikatsioonid ja miinimumnõudeid (ilma milleta programme poleks relvastusse võetud) ning kvantifitseeritav väljaöeldu (test-)pilootide poolt. Lüngad täidetud tema loodud mudeli ja arvutisimulatsioonidega. Tüüp on neid mudeleid aastaid lihvinud ning nende vastavust päriseluga kontrollinud nii palju kui võimalik.F-15C Eagle – data taken directly from F-15C -1 using F100-PW-220 data, A-A only
F-15E “Mudhen” – data taken directly from F-15E -1 using F100-PW-229 data, A-G only
F-22A Raptor – data estimated from stated performance and engineering analysis
F-16C “Viper”– data taken directly from HAF -1 using F110-GE-129 data
A-10C “Hog”– Data taken directly from A-10A -1, A-G only
F-35A “Stubby” – data estimated from stated performance and engineering analysis
See võiks näidata, et nende mudelite tõepärasus pole sugugi kõige hullem.Tundub et artiklis on küll pea kõik "tõlkes" kaduma läinud, tuntud eesti ajakirjanduse headusesTroll kirjutas: "400 miljardit kulus uue hävitaja väljatöötamisele, nüüd ilmneb, et lennuki "aju" ei tööta"
http://forte.delfi.ee/news/kosmos/400-m ... d=74314005
GAO juhtis raportis tähelepanu kahle probleemikohale:ALIS information flows from standard operating units (SOUs) at each F-35 base to a central point of entry (CPE) that connects the bases to a computer server known as the Autonomic Logistics Operating Unit (ALOU).
...
Pilots, maintainers and officers at three of five F-35 sites the GAO visited raised doubts that the system can be deployed as planned to forward locations. “For example, users are concerned about the large server size and connectivity requirements, and whether the system’s infrastructure can maintain power and withstand a high-temperature environment,” the agency said.
...
Among other issues, users the GAO interviewed were concerned that with just one national CPE and a lone ALOU, the system lacks redundancy. There is “no backup system for continuity of operations if either of these servers were to fail. Specifically, squadron leadership at two sites expressed concern about how the loss of electricity due to weather or other damaging situations could adversely affect fleet operations if either the central point of entry or the ALOU went offline.” Further, the system presents a security risk in that classified information is moved from the aircraft to the network on compact discs, and the ALOU and CPE could also be vulnerable.
F-22 liini varajane kinnipanek oli tõesti paras rumalus Gates'i poolt, ajal mil COIN Afganistaanis ja Iraagis kippus eelarvesse kilomeetriseid auke tegema ja seda oli vaja lappida ...man21 kirjutas:Üleeile lugesin, et ameeriklased võtavad uuesti tootmisse F-22 Raptor-i. Kui see on tõsi, siis väga meeldiv.
). Nimelt palus ta USAF'il uurida palju maksaks liini taaskäivitamine. Neid uuringuid on varemgi tehtud ja juba 5 aastat tagasi tundus, et läheb ikka pagana kalliks:
See teeks 75 täiendava lennuki jaoks, koos kõigi lisakuludega $220M lennuki kohta 2008 aasta dollarites (inflatsioon praeguseks veel +10%). Seda siis 2010 aasta hinnangu järgi, eks näis mis uus ütleb.Air Combat Command chief Gen Herbert “Hawk” Carlisle said in September that he “dreams” about the day F-22 assembly resumes, but admits it’s an expensive proposition. In 2010, a RAND study commissioned by air force placed the cost at $17 billion (2008 dollars) for 75 more aircraft.
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... er-421019/
Ma isegi täitsa usun neid hinnaalandamise prognoose. Kõlab üsna sedamoodi, et sellises suurusjärgus võiks olla tegeliku seeriatootmise mõju.Gideonic kirjutas:...
Võrdluseks uusima satsi LRIP9 F-35A maksab hetkel $98M (C ja B märgatavalt kallimad), Lockheed on korduvalt lubanud hinna alla tuua $85M peale 2018 aastaks (samuti 2018 aasta dollarites). Plaanis on tuua veel, kuid seda ei ole välja lubatud (eesmärk on circa 65-70M).See 2018 prognoos on üsna lühiajaline ja julge (pangem tähele mis tegelikult saab!). Iga LRIP kokkulepe on avalikustatud, näiteks LRIP8 oli veel $108M F-35A tükist. Eks näis.
...