Kuni raudrist küsimust välja mõtleb, pean pea longu laskma ja tunnistama, et ei olnud admiral neh

Ei tea kust see minu peakolusse on pidama jäänud, sest Walteri raamatut pole lugenudki.
Aga see raadiojaama küsimus oli põnev! Kuna vedelen kodus haiguslehel, siis oli aega ka ise vastust otsida ja kohe targem tunne

Selgemaks sai ka miks vastase raadiojaama õnge mindi:
As the Allied invasion progressed, the breakdown in the Germans' field communications
became so grave that many of their commanders began tuning in to Soldatensender
Calais for situation reports, and using them to constantly update the changing order of
battle on their staff maps. The reports, obtained directly from SHAEF headquarters, were
accurate 99 times out of 100. The hundredth time came when some false information was
inserted at the request of tactical deception experts, to send the enemy headlong into a
trap.
One incident at this time might show that the detail in the broadcasts was indeed listened
to and resulted in a specific capitulation. Soldatensender Calais had been dropping
references to new American ultra-modern "superweapons" including talk of a new
phosphorous shell that could penetrate anything. The German General commanding the
fort that blocked the advance onto the Cherbourg peninsula insisted he was under orders
to fight to the last man. Then, in negotiating a way out the commander proposed that if
the Americans could fire one of those new phosphorous shells, it would prove his
position was hopeless. The Americans fired an ordinary anti-tank shell into the wall of
the fort. Good enough. The general trooped out with his men.
http://libraryautomation.com/nymas/radioproppaper.pdf
Hea artikkel neile, kes normaalsel tasemel "inglishit" panevad ja sellelaadse õõnestustöö köögipoole vastu huvi tunnevad