asiootus kirjutas:Trump keeras nähtavasti (ettekavatsetult?) oma Twitteri säutsudega Venemaa liitlase Assadi vastase rünnaku pekki?
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/04/ ... l[quote]It would make sense for U.S. forces to give Russia a heads-up on possible targets and what we might be attacking to avoid killing more Russians. Our forces would lose the element of surprise in an attack, but they’d lessen the chances of starting a U.S.-Russia war that in the worst-case scenario could turn into World War III.[/quote]Samast artiklist:
What if Russia decided to respond to more Russian deaths in Syria with aggression in a different part of the world, like in the Baltics?
While it seems unlikely, this is certainly possible. And in fact, this is what happened in a “wargame” – a simulated military conflict – that I was involved in as part of my duties working at a Washington think tank. The results of the simulation, sadly, were tragic: a fictional nuclear war was unleashed.
Ega lennuvälju, laboreid ja muud infrat, mida juba maatasa tehakse, ei anna kuidagi nendesse Vene baasidesse varjule viia. Tänane oli algus, rünnakud jätkuvad. Tehakse täppistööd. Eks näeb, millega nüüd venelased vastavad. Süüria väidab, et toodi omajagu rakette alla ka. Eks näis... Pigem BS, sest venelased ei osalenud, olid vait kui kuldid rukkis. Ma siiski arvan, et kui ka USA ja Venemaa Süürias karvupidi kokku lähevad, siis tuumasõda ikkagi alustada ei taheta. See on ikka väga viimane võimalus, kui oled täielikus meeleheites.
Asi siis õrnahingelise Putini solvamises
