Sõrkõi on soviett, kes juhib arhailiselt, demoraliseerib ja mikromanageerib. Temaga ei saa midagi paremaks minna (kuna ta oli maaväe juht siis mitte ka hullemaks vast) Natukene meeldetuletusi sel teemal möödunud aastast:
https://x.com/tatarigami_ua/status/1720 ... xuy7OaVjLQ
In yesterday's speech, President Zelensky stated that he has ordered a reshuffle in the command structure of the Armed Forces. However, until General Syrski, widely disrespected within the army, is replaced, substantial improvements are unlikely.
General Syrski's leadership is bankrupt, his presence or orders coming from his name are demoralizing, and he undermines trust in the command in general. His relentless pursuit of tactical gains constantly depletes our valuable human resources, resulting in tactical advances such as capturing tree lines or small villages, with no operational goals in mind. This approach creates a never-ending cycle of fruitless assaults that drain personnel. His failure to withdraw troops from Bakhmut in a timely manner earlier this year, coupled with his obsession to retake it, by utilizing Wagner Group's tactics, further depletes our resources and has more far-reaching consequences than people might realize.
Kiievi kohta:
No. Most of the weight was carried on the shoulders of brigades, such as the 72nd brigade. The defense of Kyiv wasn't actually organized in a proper manner before the invasion. The distribution of firearms to civilians was a sign of anything but a well-prepared defense.
…
Operations were conducted at the brigade level, with decisions made on the personal initiatives of commanders. The only useful thing that Syrskyi did is that he didn't intervene. Feel free to name any operation or show me a plan created by Syrski that demonstrates his planning
Harkivi kohta väidetavalt võttis ka ainult teiste tegude eest krediiti, kui aga vaja vastutada kaob uttu.
Tasub ka meenutada mis rolli kandis Debaltseves.
https://x.com/itstroygirl/status/175563 ... xuy7OaVjLQ